Bibliografía de la tesis · Referencia 06 · 2011

NAC pediátrica: recomendaciones y certeza

20 preguntas clínicas para aprender a leer una guía y la evidencia que sostiene cada decisión.

Bradley JS, Byington CL, Shah SS, et al. The Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Infants and Children Older Than 3 Months of Age: Clinical Practice Guidelines by PIDS and IDSA. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53(7):e25–e76. DOI:10.1093/cid/cir531.

Artículo original · Volver al índice

Lectura educativa del documento de 2011. Las recomendaciones y cifras conservan su contexto histórico; esta página no las actualiza para 2026. Los ejercicios matemáticos son didácticos.

Executive Summary · resumen ejecutivo

Diseño

Guía PIDS/IDSA con revisión de literatura y consenso experto. No es un ensayo propio ni un metaanálisis con una única estimación combinada.

Población

Niños previamente sanos >3 meses, con NAC ambulatoria u hospitalaria en Estados Unidos. Excluye neonatos, inmunocomprometidos, ventilación domiciliaria y ciertas enfermedades crónicas.

Estructura

20 preguntas clínicas, 92 recomendaciones numeradas, diez tablas y una figura. Cada recomendación se acompaña de fuerza y calidad de evidencia.

Objetivo: disminuir morbilidad y mortalidad mediante recomendaciones que el clínico aplica según las circunstancias individuales.

Introduction

Burden of Disease

Describe carga mundial y datos estadounidenses anteriores a 2011. Hospitalizaciones en 2006: 201,1 por 100.000 hasta 18 años; en menores de un año, 912,9; entre 13–18 años, 62,8. Son tasas de hospitalización por códigos diagnósticos, no de toda NAC ni probabilidades diagnósticas.

Etiology

Virus y bacterias; detección de varios agentes puede reflejar coinfección o colonización. La técnica de detección y selección de pacientes modifican las proporciones. No se deben promediar como si los estudios fueran intercambiables.

Clinical Questions Addressed by the Expert Panel

Las preguntas I–XX del recorrido siguiente cubren lugar de atención, pruebas, tratamiento, complicaciones, falta de respuesta, alta y prevención. El documento no aborda todos los cuidados cotidianos del niño internado ni todas las situaciones especiales.

Methodology

Practice Guidelines

Recomendaciones desarrolladas para apoyar decisiones; deben ser válidas, reproducibles, claras, aplicables y flexibles.

Panel Composition

Panel multidisciplinario de pediatría comunitaria, salud pública, cuidados intensivos, urgencias, hospitalismo, infectología, neumología y cirugía, con revisores de microbiología y radiología intervencionista.

Process Overview

Búsquedas en PubMed hasta mayo de 2010, incorporando artículos posteriores especialmente relevantes, resúmenes de reuniones y guías existentes. GRADE para fuerza y calidad.

Consensus Development Based on Evidence

Subgrupos por pregunta, reuniones, revisión interna y externa, y aprobación de organizaciones participantes. La falta de evidencia de alta calidad en varias áreas obliga a usar juicio clínico.

Guidelines and Conflict of Interest

Declaración de intereses financieros y otros vínculos; evaluación caso por caso para limitar roles cuando correspondiera. La declaración no demuestra ausencia ni presencia de sesgo por sí sola.

Table 1 · Strength of Recommendations and Quality of Evidence

Calidad de evidencia

¿Cuánta confianza merece el efecto estimado?

+
Balance y contexto

Beneficios, daños, cargas y valores.

→
Fuerza

¿Con qué firmeza orientar la acción?

CalidadLectura de la tabla de 2011
AltaInvestigación adicional poco probable que cambie la confianza en el efecto.
ModeradaPuede cambiar la confianza y la estimación.
BajaProbable impacto importante de investigación adicional.
Muy bajaEstimación del efecto muy incierta.

Fuerte no significa efecto grande ni evidencia alta. Una acción puede tener un balance favorable aun con pocos datos. Débil no significa inútil: puede haber alternativas razonables por contexto y preferencias.

Los niveles describen confianza, no porcentajes de certeza. No se codifican alta=100%, baja=25%.

Recorrido por las 20 preguntas clínicas

Guideline Recommendations for Management of CAP in Infants and Children. Se conserva el orden I–XX. Los apartados “Recommendations” y “Evidence Summary” se muestran como recomendación resumida y lectura de su sustento; el resumen ejecutivo y el cuerpo repiten estas preguntas.

Site-of-Care Management Decisions

I. When Does a Child or Infant With CAP Require Hospitalization?

Recomendaciones 1–4 del original.

Recommendations · síntesis

NAC moderada/grave, hipoxemia sostenida <90% a nivel del mar o distrés; considerar lactantes de 3–6 meses con sospecha bacteriana, patógenos virulentos y barreras de observación/seguimiento.

Evidence Summary · cómo leer el sustento

La valoración integra fisiología y condiciones de cuidado; un corte no reemplaza el examen.

II. When Should a Child With CAP Be Admitted to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) or a Unit With Continuous Cardiorespiratory Monitoring?

Recomendaciones 5–11 del original.

Recommendations · síntesis

Ventilación invasiva, soporte no invasivo agudo, insuficiencia respiratoria inminente, compromiso hemodinámico, SpO₂ <92% pese a FiO₂≥0,50 o alteración mental.

Evidence Summary · cómo leer el sustento

Los puntajes no son criterio exclusivo de UCI. La tabla 4 se adapta de criterios adultos y requiere contexto pediátrico.

Diagnostic Testing for Pediatric CAP

III. What Diagnostic Laboratory and Imaging Tests Should Be Used in a Child With Suspected CAP in an Outpatient or Inpatient Setting?

Recomendaciones 12–38 del original.

Recommendations · síntesis

Seleccionar pruebas según gravedad, ámbito y capacidad de modificar decisiones. Evitar hemocultivos y Rx rutinarios en niños ambulatorios estables.

Evidence Summary · cómo leer el sustento

Se desarrolla cada subtítulo diagnóstico debajo: rendimiento, referencia imperfecta y utilidad clínica son distintos.

IV. What Additional Diagnostic Tests Should Be Used in a Child With Severe or Life-Threatening CAP?

Recomendaciones 39–40 del original.

Recommendations · síntesis

Aspirado traqueal al intubar y estudios virales dirigidos; técnicas invasivas reservadas a enfermedad grave sin diagnóstico inicial.

Evidence Summary · cómo leer el sustento

Colonización de tráquea puede producir cultivos que no representan el agente pulmonar. Más detección no implica mejor exactitud.

Anti-Infective Treatment

V. Which Anti-Infective Therapy Should Be Provided to a Child With Suspected CAP in Both Outpatient and Inpatient Settings?

Recomendaciones 41–49 del original.

Recommendations · síntesis

Outpatients: muchos preescolares con cuadro viral no requieren antibiótico; amoxicilina para sospecha bacteriana, macrólido ante atípicos e influenza antiviral según contexto. Inpatients: ampicilina/penicilina si vacunado y resistencia local apropiada; cefalosporina en situaciones indicadas; añadir cobertura de atípicos o S. aureus cuando se sospechen.

Evidence Summary · cómo leer el sustento

La selección se basa en edad, vacunación, epidemiología y gravedad; no en la opacidad aislada.

VI. How Can Resistance to Antimicrobials Be Minimized?

Recomendaciones 50–53 del original.

Recommendations · síntesis

Limitar exposición, espectro, dosis insuficientes y duración; usar el curso eficaz más corto.

Evidence Summary · cómo leer el sustento

La guía señala que reducir consumo no demuestra automáticamente menos infecciones por organismos resistentes: son desenlaces diferentes.

VII. What Is the Appropriate Duration of Antimicrobial Therapy for CAP?

Recomendaciones 54–55 del original.

Recommendations · síntesis

Diez días eran los cursos mejor estudiados en 2011; admite que cursos menores podrían servir en enfermedad leve. SAMR puede requerir más tiempo.

Evidence Summary · cómo leer el sustento

“Mejor estudiado” no significa “única duración eficaz”. No se presenta como pauta actual.

VIII. How Should the Clinician Follow the Child With CAP for the Expected Response to Therapy?

Recomendaciones 56 del original.

Recommendations · síntesis

Esperar mejoría clínica y de laboratorio en 48–72 h; investigar falta de mejoría o deterioro.

Evidence Summary · cómo leer el sustento

El curso radiográfico puede rezagarse respecto del clínico; una imagen residual no prueba fracaso.

Adjunctive Surgical and Non–Anti-Infective Therapy for Pediatric CAP

IX. How Should a Parapneumonic Effusion Be Identified?

Recomendaciones 57 del original.

Recommendations · síntesis

Confirmar líquido pleural con Rx; ecografía o TC si no es concluyente.

Evidence Summary · cómo leer el sustento

La ecografía también define tamaño y loculaciones; diagnóstico y planificación de drenaje cumplen funciones distintas.

X. What Factors Are Important in Determining Whether Drainage of the Parapneumonic Effusion Is Required?

Recomendaciones 58–59 del original.

Recommendations · síntesis

Tamaño y compromiso respiratorio; tabla 8 y figura 1 organizan la decisión.

Evidence Summary · cómo leer el sustento

Las categorías de riesgo no son porcentajes calibrados de mal resultado.

XI. What Laboratory Testing Should Be Performed on Pleural Fluid?

Recomendaciones 60–63 del original.

Recommendations · síntesis

Gram y cultivo; PCR puede aumentar detección. pH, glucosa, proteínas y LDH no se recomiendan rutinariamente por escaso cambio de conducta; celularidad ayuda a diferenciar otras etiologías.

Evidence Summary · cómo leer el sustento

Cultivo negativo no excluye infección, especialmente con antibióticos previos.

XII. What Are the Drainage Options for Parapneumonic Effusions?

Recomendaciones 64–66 del original.

Recommendations · síntesis

Pequeños no complicados: antibiótico sin drenaje habitual. Moderados con distrés, grandes o purulentos: drenaje. Tubo con fibrinólisis o VATS según experiencia; libre flujo puede permitir tubo solo.

Evidence Summary · cómo leer el sustento

Los ensayos pequeños no establecen superioridad universal de una técnica; similitud observada no demuestra equivalencia formal.

XIII. When Should VATS or Open Decortication Be Considered in Patients Who Have Had Chest Tube Drainage, With or Without Fibrinolytic Therapy?

Recomendaciones 67 del original.

Recommendations · síntesis

VATS ante derrame moderado/grande y compromiso persistente tras unos 2–3 días de tubo y fibrinólisis completada; decorticación abierta como alternativa de mayor morbilidad.

Evidence Summary · cómo leer el sustento

Fiebre persistente aislada no define fracaso del drenaje.

XIV. When Should a Chest Tube Be Removed Either After Primary Drainage or VATS?

Recomendaciones 68 del original.

Recommendations · síntesis

Sin fuga aérea y drenaje <1 mL/kg/24 h, habitualmente estimado desde las últimas 12 h.

Evidence Summary · cómo leer el sustento

Recomendación fuerte con evidencia muy baja: útil para distinguir fuerza de certeza. No es una calculadora clínica validada.

XV. What Antibiotic Therapy and Duration Is Indicated for the Treatment of Parapneumonic Effusion/Empyema?

Recomendaciones 69–71 del original.

Recommendations · síntesis

Dirigir por cultivo y susceptibilidad; con cultivo negativo seguir esquema hospitalario. Duración según drenaje y respuesta, habitualmente 2–4 semanas en el texto.

Evidence Summary · cómo leer el sustento

Rango de duración no es comparación aleatorizada de dos contra cuatro semanas.

Management of the Child Not Responding to Treatment

XVI. What Is the Appropriate Management of a Child Who Is Not Responding to Treatment for CAP?

Recomendaciones 72–75 del original.

Recommendations · síntesis

A las 48–72 h reevaluar gravedad, imágenes y agentes persistentes/resistentes/nuevos; BAL en ventilados y otras muestras invasivas para situaciones graves sin diagnóstico.

Evidence Summary · cómo leer el sustento

Falta de respuesta puede deberse al huésped, fármaco, complicación o diagnóstico alternativo; no sólo a resistencia.

XVII. How Should Nonresponders With Pulmonary Abscess or Necrotizing Pneumonia Be Managed?

Recomendaciones 76 del original.

Recommendations · síntesis

Antibióticos IV iniciales; abscesos periféricos definidos sin comunicación bronquial pueden drenarse por imagen. Muchos drenan por árbol bronquial.

Evidence Summary · cómo leer el sustento

Recomendación débil y evidencia muy baja; las intervenciones se individualizan.

Discharge Criteria

XVIII. When Can a Hospitalized Child With CAP Be Safely Discharged?

Recomendaciones 77–84 del original.

Recommendations · síntesis

Mejoría global y fiebre disminuida 12–24 h; SpO₂>90% en aire 12–24 h; estado mental estable, sin trabajo respiratorio importante, tolerancia del tratamiento y cuidados/seguimiento asegurados.

Evidence Summary · cómo leer el sustento

No todos los criterios tienen la misma calidad de evidencia; capacidad familiar y barreras importan tanto como parámetros clínicos.

XIX. When Is Parenteral Outpatient Therapy Indicated, In Contrast to Oral Step-Down Therapy?

Recomendaciones 85–87 del original.

Recommendations · síntesis

Si ya no requiere cuidados agudos pero sí vía parenteral, programa pediátrico adecuado; preferir transición oral cuando es posible.

Evidence Summary · cómo leer el sustento

Evidencia para vías y programas es limitada; estancia y costos dependen del sistema.

Prevention

XX. Can Pediatric CAP Be Prevented?

Recomendaciones 88–92 del original.

Recommendations · síntesis

Vacunación contra neumococo, Hib, pertussis e influenza; proteger contactos de lactantes e inmunoprofilaxis VSR en alto riesgo según guías de su época.

Evidence Summary · cómo leer el sustento

Las vacunas, formulaciones y criterios son históricos. Un efecto relativo no indica beneficio absoluto sin riesgo basal.

Los subtítulos de diagnóstico · sección III

Microbiologic Testing

Blood Cultures: Outpatient

No rutinario en ambulatorios vacunados y no tóxicos; obtener en fracaso, progresión o deterioro. Positividad por patógenos <2% en estudios citados.

Blood Cultures: Inpatient

En NAC bacteriana moderada/grave y complicada. Positividad usual citada 1,4–3,4%; mayor en muestras seleccionadas. Seleccionar los más graves puede inflar rendimiento.

Follow-up Blood Cultures

No rutinarios en bacteriemia neumocócica con mejoría; sí documentar resolución de bacteriemia por S. aureus.

Sputum Gram Stain and Culture

En hospitalizados capaces de expectorar. Calidad de muestra y colonización condicionan interpretación.

Urinary Antigen Detection Tests

No recomendado para neumococo en niños: colonización puede generar positivos sin enfermedad invasiva. Rendimiento adulto no se transfiere automáticamente.

Testing For Viral Pathogens

Influenza y otros virus pueden orientar pruebas y tratamiento. Un positivo no elimina coinfección y un negativo no descarta virus con sensibilidad imperfecta.

Testing for Atypical Bacteria

Estudiar Mycoplasma ante sospecha; dificultades de disponibilidad y exactitud. El texto no recomienda prueba para C. pneumoniae por falta de test oportuno y fiable.

Ancillary Diagnostic Testing

Complete Blood Cell Count

No rutinario en toda NAC ambulatoria; contextualizar en cuadros graves. Leucocitosis por sí sola discrimina mal etiología.

Acute-Phase Reactants

PCR, VSG y PCT no separan virus/bacterias por sí solos. Pueden apoyar seguimiento de enfermedad grave.

Pulse Oximetry

Medir ante sospecha de hipoxemia; orienta nivel de cuidado y estudios.

Chest Radiography

SubtítuloRecomendaciónFuerza / evidencia
Initial Chest Radiographs: OutpatientNo Rx rutinaria si puede tratarse ambulatoriamente (31); sí ante hipoxemia/distrés/fracasos (32)Fuerte/alta para 31; fuerte/moderada para 32
Initial Chest Radiographs: InpatientRx en hospitalizados (33)Fuerte/moderada
Follow-up Chest Radiograph(s)No control rutinario en buena recuperación (34); repetir por deterioro/falta de respuesta y situaciones específicas (35–38)Moderada o baja, según recomendación

La sección de evidencia “Initial Chest Radiographs” agrega el caso de fiebre prolongada y tos aun sin taquipnea/distrés. Para recurrente en mismo lóbulo o colapso con sospecha anatómica propone control a 4–6 semanas. No elimina el juicio clínico ni diagnostica bacterias por imagen.

Los subtítulos de tratamiento · sección V

Outpatients · Inpatients

La elección empírica se organiza por ámbito y luego por sospecha etiológica; no todos requieren antibacterianos.

Bacterial Pathogens in CAP

Streptococcus pneumoniae

Amoxicilina para NAC bacteriana leve/moderada ambulatoria; penicilina/ampicilina o alternativas según resistencia local, susceptibilidad y gravedad.

Haemophilus influenzae

Diferenciar producción de betalactamasa y estado vacunal; terapia dirigida según aislamiento.

Streptococcus pyogenes

Generalmente sensible a penicilina; en enfermedad invasiva se discuten decisiones adicionales según contexto.

Staphylococcus aureus

Distinguir MSSA y MRSA; cobertura según susceptibilidad, gravedad y características clínicas.

Atypical Pneumonia

Mycoplasma pneumoniae

Los autores remarcan falta de ensayos pediátricos adecuados que separen historia natural y efecto del antibiótico; no confundir detección con beneficio terapéutico demostrado en toda edad.

Chlamydia trachomatis · C. pneumoniae

Situaciones de edad y pruebas diferentes; la guía excluye del alcance a los lactantes menores de tres meses, aunque describe etiologías y datos que contextualizan.

Viral Pathogens in CAP

Influenza

Antiviral temprano y considerar coinfección en cuadros graves. Resultados negativos imperfectos no obligan a demorar tratamiento si la sospecha es fuerte.

Respiratory Syncytial Virus

Discute ribavirina y profilaxis con palivizumab de su época; no presenta esto como indicación actual.

Parainfluenza Virus, Adenovirus, Metapneumovirus, Rhinovirus, Coronavirus, and Bocavirus

En 2011 no había datos prospectivos controlados para antivirales de estas etiologías en NAC pediátrica.

Mapa de las diez tablas y la figura

Título originalPara qué sirve y cómo leerlo
Table 1. Strength of Recommendations and Quality of EvidenceDos dimensiones GRADE; desarrollada arriba.
Table 2. Complications Associated With Community-Acquired PneumoniaPulmonares: derrame/empiema, neumotórax, absceso, fístula, necrosis, insuficiencia respiratoria; metastásicas y sistémicas. Lista, no prevalencias.
Table 3. Criteria for Respiratory Distress in Children With PneumoniaFR por edad, disnea, retracciones, quejido, aleteo, apnea, sensorio y SpO₂. Criterios clínicos, no probabilidades.
Table 4. Criteria for CAP Severity of Illness in Children with Community-Acquired PneumoniaMayores y menores; considerar monitoreo intensivo con ≥1 mayor o ≥2 menores. Adaptación de adultos; no usar como único criterio.
Table 5. Selection of Antimicrobial Therapy for Specific PathogensOpciones dirigidas IV y oral, susceptibilidad y dosis; consultar tabla original e31–e32 para instrucciones completas.
Table 6. Influenza Antiviral TherapyAgentes, formulaciones y edades del documento histórico; no un ensayo comparativo.
Table 7. Empiric Therapy for Pediatric Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP)Selección empírica por edad, vacunación, ámbito y etiología sospechada; revisar dosis máximas en original.
Table 8. Factors Associated with Outcomes and Indication for Drainage of Parapneumonic EffusionsTamaño y compromiso respiratorio/purulencia orientan drenaje; bajo/moderado/alto no son riesgos cuantificados.
Table 9. Summary of Published Fibrinolysis RegimensProtocolos de tPA/uroquinasa de estudios distintos. No comparar dosis sin tener en cuenta protocolo y población.
Table 10. Areas for Future Research in Pediatric Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP)19 áreas: epidemiología, gravedad, diagnóstico, Rx, resistencia, respuesta, terapia, costos, drenaje, duración, alta y barreras.

Figure 1 · Management of pneumonia with parapneumonic effusion

Derrame pequeño

Sin complicaciones: antibióticos, observación.

↔
Moderado

Distrés o pus orientan drenaje.

↔
Grande

Drenaje en la mayoría; valorar evolución.

Esquema didáctico simplificado a partir de tabla 8/figura 1, no reproducción integral del algoritmo. Pequeño: <10 mm o <¼ hemitórax; moderado: >10 mm y <½; grande: >½. Los límites textuales no cubren cada caso frontera; requiere valoración clínica.

Estadística y matemática en evidencia real

1 · Cambiar el denominador cambia el mensaje

En un estudio citado, el hemocultivo modificó antibióticos en 5 de 6 niños con cultivo positivo, entre 291 estudiados (e46).

83,3%
5/6: entre positivos.
1,7%
5/291: entre todos los cultivados.

No se contradicen. El primer porcentaje describe impacto condicionado a ser positivo; el segundo, rendimiento global observado. Ninguno demuestra por sí mismo beneficio clínico ni costo-efectividad.

2 · Diferencia absoluta y relativa: prueba rápida de influenza

La guía cita un ensayo de 391 pacientes donde se aleatorizó informar o no al médico el resultado de influenza. Entre positivos: prescripción 7,3% con resultado conocido frente a 24,5% sin conocimiento (e46; referencia 106). No todos los 391 pertenecen a esos dos subgrupos.

Diferencia = 24,5 − 7,3 = 17,2 puntos porcentuales
RR = 7,3 / 24,5 ≈ 0,30
Reducción relativa ≈ 70,2%
OR = (0,073/0,927) / (0,245/0,755) ≈ 0,24

Son cálculos didácticos sobre porcentajes redondeados, no efectos nuevos ajustados ni estimaciones con IC. El evento es prescribir; no curación, mortalidad o adecuación. Invertir 0,172 da ≈5,8 como inverso de diferencia de prescripción, pero llamarlo NNT clínico sin matiz confundiría desenlaces.

3 · Odds ratio y regresión logística: qué hay realmente aquí

Bradley cita una cohorte retrospectiva de adultos: diagnóstico rápido de influenza asociado a odds seis veces mayores de suspender/no iniciar antibiótico que diagnóstico por PCR demorado (e47; ref. 112). No es un OR calculado por el panel ni un efecto causal demostrado por la guía.

Se mantiene OR=6 sólo para mostrar matemática. No predice a un niño ni representa el riesgo basal del estudio.

Una regresión logística podría modelar ese desenlace sí/no y ajustar covariables; los coeficientes exponenciados son OR. Esta guía no realiza una regresión logística propia ni proporciona aquí el modelo completo del estudio adulto: no se inventan covariables ni se da por comprobado un ajuste específico.

4 · Significativo ≠ suficiente para discriminar

Los reactantes pueden ser mayores en neumonía neumocócica y aun solaparse mucho. En un estudio citado, PCR>6 mg/dL tenía sensibilidad 26% y VPP43%; VSG>35 mm/h, sensibilidad25% y VPP38% (e49). Cada denominador es diferente: detectar sólo 26 de cada 100 casos no equivale a que 26 de cada 100 positivos sean enfermos.

5 · Concordancia no es exactitud

La guía cita κ>0,6 para 19 de 20 lectores al evaluar 92 Rx con definiciones y entrenamiento estandarizados (e50). κ corrige concordancia esperada por márgenes; no significa sensibilidad60% ni que 60% de las neumonías sean bacterianas. Dos lectores pueden coincidir y estar equivocados.

6 · Ensayos pequeños: no superioridad ≠ equivalencia

Fibrinólisis frente a VATS: ensayos de 30+30 y 18+18, con resultados similares y menor costo de fibrinólisis; otro de 10+8 usó fibrinólisis sólo como rescate y favoreció VATS en estancia (e60). Protocolos distintos y muestras pequeñas limitan la comparación. Equivalencia requiere margen predefinido y precisión suficiente; “no significativo” no basta.

7 · Un evento raro necesita muchos participantes

El documento cita 156 muertes entre 20.703 hospitalizados: 0,75% (e67). Se refiere a esa cohorte, no a toda NAC mundial. La rareza dificulta usar mortalidad como desenlace principal en ciertos contextos.

Multiplicar N×0,0075 da eventos esperados, no tamaño muestral requerido. Un cálculo de potencia requiere diferencia a detectar, alfa, potencia, diseño y pérdidas.

Por qué no combinar todo en un metaanálisis único

Las preguntas abarcan diagnóstico, tratamiento, prevención, alta y drenaje, con desenlaces y poblaciones diferentes. No hay un efecto común coherente para combinar. Metaanálisis por pregunta podría ser pertinente con estudios comparables; GRADE evalúa confianza y recomendación, no sustituye una fórmula de promedio.

Areas for Future Research

Objective Outcome Measures

Estandarizar gravedad y tiempos de mejoría, necesidad de soporte, complicaciones, hospitalización, estancia, readmisión y mortalidad. Ingreso y estancia también dependen de factores sociales y del sistema; no son marcadores puros de gravedad.

Cost Analysis

Costos como resultado secundario en terapias de eficacia similar; incluir costos médicos y tiempo laboral familiar. Cifras del texto están en dólares y años históricos, no precios actuales ni valores trasladables a Argentina.

Long-Term Disability

Pocas muestras pequeñas y sin medición pulmonar previa. Asociación de NAC temprana y obstrucción posterior no demuestra que la neumonía la haya causado: susceptibilidad previa puede explicar ambas.

Table 10 enumera 19 necesidades. Destaca validar interpretación radiográfica, estudiar pruebas virales y prescripción, duración eficaz mínima, drenaje y barreras de acceso.

Limitaciones y sesgos · lectura crítica

Evidencia heterogénea

Ensayos, observaciones, datos adultos y consenso. La certeza es específica de cada recomendación; no existe un solo nivel para toda la guía.

Indirectitud

Criterios de gravedad adaptados de adultos; pruebas y tratamientos de otros ámbitos. Extrapolar exige justificar población y contexto.

Selección y medición

Estudios de cultivos en quienes se estudiaron por gravedad; Rx subjetiva; patógenos con diferente facilidad de detección. Distorsionan proporciones etiológicas y rendimiento.

Confusión

Más graves reciben más imágenes, antibióticos y hospitalización. Asociaciones entre estas variables no atribuyen efectos causales.

Tiempo y alcance

US2011, búsqueda principal hasta 2010; vacunas, resistencia y terapias cambian. No aplicable automáticamente a neonatos o enfermedades fuera del alcance.

Consenso y conflictos

Proceso explícito y declaración de vínculos reducen opacidad, pero no eliminan sesgos de juicio o selección de evidencia.

Conexión con tu tesis

Permite definir recomendaciones de uso de Rx y contextualizar selección de episodios. En una muestra recuperada por Rx o antibiótico, no se puede estimar uso de Rx entre todos los niños con sospecha de NAC ni juzgar causalidad o adecuación sólo por categoría radiográfica.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Reconoce revisores y apoyo de coordinación. Las recomendaciones no son un documento oficial de CDC; la aplicación es voluntaria y debe considerar circunstancias individuales.

Financial support

Apoyo de IDSA.

Potential conflicts of interest

Se declaran ensayos, consultorías, honorarios, testimonios y financiación, incluidos vínculos de algunos autores con fabricantes de vacunas y fármacos. Consultar detalle completo en e68; no inferir sesgo demostrado a partir de la declaración.

References

Referencias del artículo original
1. Dean NC, Bateman KA, Donnelly SM, et al. Improved clinical out-
comes with utilization of a community-acquired pneumonia guide-
line. Chest 2006; 130:794–9.
2. McCabe C, Kirchner C, Zhang H, et al. Guideline-concordant therapy
and reduced mortality and length of stay in adults with community-
acquired pneumonia: playing by the rules. Arch Intern Med 2009;
169:1525–31.
3. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging con-
sensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommenda-
tions. BMJ 2008; 336:924–6.




4. Wardlaw T, Salama P, Johansson EW, et al. Pneumonia: the leading
killer of children. Lancet 2006; 368:1048–50.
5. World Health Organization. Pneumonia. Fact sheet No. 331. 2009.
Available at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs331/en/index.
html. Accessed 7 September 2010.
6. McCracken GH Jr. Etiology and treatment of pneumonia. Pediatr
Infect Dis J 2000; 19:373–7.
7. McIntosh K. Community-acquired pneumonia in children. N Engl
J Med 2002; 346:429–37.
8. Grijalva CG, Poehling KA, Nuorti JP, et al. National impact of uni-
versal childhood immunization with pneumococcal conjugate vaccine
on outpatient medical care visits in the United States. Pediatrics 2006;
118:865–73.
9. Lee GE, Lorch SA, Sheffler-Collins S, et al. National hospitalization
trends for pediatric pneumonia and associated complications. Pedi-
atrics 2010; 126:204–13.
10. Heron M, Hoyert DL, Murphy SL, et al. Deaths: final data for 2006.
Natl Vital Stat Rep 2009; 57:1–134.
11. British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Committee. British Tho-
racic Society guidelines for the management of community acquired
pneumonia in childhood. Thorax 2002; 57:i1–24.
12. Lee PI, Chiu CH, Chen PY, et al. Guidelines for the management of
community-acquired pneumonia in children. Acta Paediatr Taiwan
2007; 48:167–80.
13. US Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Ad-
ministration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Guidance for
industry. Community-acquired bacterial pneumonia: developing
drugs for treatment. 2009. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/down-
loads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Gui-
dances/ucm123686.pdf. Accessed 7 September 2010.
14. Drummond P, Clark J, Wheeler J, et al. Community acquired pneu-
monia: a prospective UK study. Arch Dis Child 2000; 83:408–12.
15. Heiskanen-Kosma T, Korppi M, Jokinen C, et al. Etiology of child-
hood pneumonia: serologic results of a prospective, population-based
study. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1998; 17:986–91.
16. Juven T, Mertsola J, Waris M, et al. Etiology of community-acquired
pneumonia in 254 hospitalized children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2000;
19:293–8.
17. Michelow IC, Olsen K, Lozano J, et al. Epidemiology and clinical
characteristics of community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized
children. Pediatrics 2004; 113:701–7.
18. Wubbel L, Muniz L, Ahmed A, et al. Etiology and treatment of
community-acquired pneumonia in ambulatory children. Pediatr
Infect Dis J 1999; 18:98–104.
19. Bonzel L, Tenenbaum T, Schroten H, et al. Frequent detection of viral
coinfection in children hospitalized with acute respiratory tract in-
fection using a real-time polymerase chain reaction. Pediatr Infect Dis
J 2008; 27:589–94.
20. Hamano-Hasegawa K, Morozumi M, Nakayama E, et al. Compre-
hensive detection of causative pathogens using real-time PCR to di-
agnose pediatric community-acquired pneumonia. J Infect Chemother
2008;1 4 : 4 2 4 – 3 2 .
21. Techasaensiri C, Messina AF, Katz K, et al. Epidemiology and evo-
lution of invasive pneumococcal disease caused by multidrug resistant
serotypes of 19A in the 8 years after implementation of pneumococcal
conjugate vaccine immunization in Dallas, Texas. Pediatr Infect Dis
J 2010; 29:294–300.
22. Brieu N, Guyon G, Rodiere M, et al. Human bocavirus infection in
children with respiratory tract disease. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2008;
27:969–73.
23. Dawood FS, Fiore A, Kamimoto L, et al. Influenza-associated pneu-
monia in children hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed influenza,
2003–2008. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2010; 29:585–90.
24. Ng V, Tang P, Jamieson F, et al. Laboratory-based evaluation of le-
gionellosis epidemiology in Ontario, Canada, 1978 to 2006. BMC
Infect Dis 2009; 9:68.
25. Tuberculosis. Red Book 2009; 2009:680–701.
26. Field MJ, Lohr KN. Institute of Medicine Committee to Advise the
Public Health Service on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Clinical practice
guidelines: directions for a new program. Washington, DC: National
Academies Press, 1990; 8.
27. Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, et al. Infectious Diseases
Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines
on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults.
Clin Infect Dis 2007; 44(Suppl 2):S27–72.
28. Mace S. Pneumonia. In: Ahrens WR, Schafermeyer RW, eds. Pediatric
emergency medicine. Vol. Chapter 142. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2010.
29. Jadavji T, Law B, Lebel MH, et al. A practical guide for the
diagnosis and treatment of pediatric pneumonia. CMAJ 1997;
156:S703–11.
30. Sandora TJ, Harper MB. Pneumonia in hospitalized children. Pediatr
Clin North Am 2005; 52:1059–81, viii.
31. Kirelik S. Pneumonia. In: Marx JA, Hockenberger R, Walls RM et al.
eds. Rosen’s emergency medicine concepts and clinical practice.
Philadelphia, PA: Mosby Elsevier, 2008; 2554–64.
32. Fine MJ, Auble TE, Yealy DM, et al. A prediction rule to identify low-
risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med
1997; 336:243–50.
33. Lim WS, van der Eerden MM, Laing R, et al. Defining community
acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: an in-
ternational derivation and validation study. Thorax 2003; 58:377–82.
34. Capelastegui A, Espana PP, Quintana JM, et al. Validation of a pre-
dictive rule for the management of community-acquired pneumonia.
Eur Respir J 2006; 27:151–7.
35. Aujesky D, Auble TE, Yealy DM, et al. Prospective comparison of
three validated prediction rules for prognosis in community-acquired
pneumonia. Am J Med 2005; 118:384–92.
36. Fine MJ, Stone RA, Singer DE, et al. Processes and outcomes of care
for patients with community-acquired pneumonia: results from the
Pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) cohort study.
Arch Intern Med 1999; 159:970–80.
37. Mortensen EM, Coley CM, Singer DE, et al. Causes of death for
patients with community-acquired pneumonia: results from the
Pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team cohort study. Arch
Intern Med 2002; 162:1059–64.
38. Auble TE, Yealy DM, Fine MJ. Assessing prognosis and selecting an
initial site of care for adults with community-acquired pneumonia.
Infect Dis Clin North Am 1998; 12:741–59, x.
39. Nazarian DJ, Eddy OL, Lukens TW, et al. Clinical policy: critical issues
in the management of adult patients presenting to the emergency
department with community-acquired pneumonia. Ann Emerg Med
2009; 54:704–31.
40. Ruttimann UE, Pollack MM. Objective assessment of changing
mortality risks in pediatric intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med
1991; 19:474–83.
41. Peters MJ, Tasker RC, Kiff KM, et al. Acute hypoxemic respiratory
failure in children: case mix and the utility of respiratory severity
indices. Intensive Care Med 1998; 24:699–705.
42. Delport SD, Brisley T. Aetiology and outcome of severe community-
acquired pneumonia in children admitted to a paediatric intensive
care unit. S Afr Med J 2002; 92:907–11.
43. Gillet Y, Vanhems P, Lina G, et al. Factors predicting mortality in
necrotizing community-acquired pneumonia caused by Staphylococ-
cus aureus containing Panton-Valentine leukocidin. Clin Infect Dis
2007; 45:315–21.
4 4 . M a y o r d o m o - C o l u n g aJ ,M e d i n aA ,R e yC ,e ta l .P r e d i c t i v ef a c t o r so f
non invasive ventilation failure i n critically ill children: a pro-
spective epidemiological study. Intensive Care Med 2009;3 5 :
527–36.
45. Fu LY, Ruthazer R, Wilson I, et al. Brief hospitalization and pulse
oximetry for predicting amoxicillin treatment failure in children with
severe pneumonia. Pediatrics 2006; 118:e1822–30.




46. Niederman MS, Bass JB Jr., Campbell GD, et al. Guidelines for the
initial management of adults with community-acquired pneumonia:
diagnosis, assessment of severity, and initial antimicrobial therapy.
American Thoracic Society. Medical Section of the American Lung
Association. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993; 148:1418–26.
47. Bartlett JG, Mundy LM. Community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl
J Med 1995; 333:1618–24.
48. Fine MJ, Hanusa BH, Lave JR, et al. Comparison of a disease-specific
and a generic severity of illness measure for patients with community-
acquired pneumonia. J Gen Intern Med 1995; 10:359–68.
49. Brown L, Dannenberg B. Pulse oximetry in discharge decision-
making: a survey of emergency physicians. CJEM 2002; 4:388–93.
50. Lozano JM, Steinhoff M, Ruiz JG, et al. Clinical predictors of acute
radiological pneumonia and hypoxaemia at high altitude. Arch Dis
Child 1994; 71:323–7.
51. Margolis PA, Ferkol TW, Marsocci S, et al. Accuracy of the clinical
examination in detecting hypoxemia in infants with respiratory ill-
ness. J Pediatr 1994; 124:552–60.
52. Demers AM, Morency P, Mberyo-Yaah F, et al. Risk factors for
mortality among children hospitalized because of acute respiratory
infections in Bangui, Central African Republic. Pediatr Infect Dis J
2000; 19:424–32.
53. Ayieko P, English M. In children aged 2-59 months with pneumonia,
which clinical signs best predict hypoxaemia? J Trop Pediatr 2006;
52:307–10.
54. Mamtani M, Patel A, Hibberd PL, et al. A clinical tool to predict failed
response to therapy in children with severe pneumonia. Pediatr
Pulmonol 2009; 44:379–86.
55. Smyth A, Carty H, Hart CA. Clinical predictors of hypoxaemia in
children with pneumonia. Ann Trop Paediatr 1998; 18:31–40.
56. Shah S, Bachur R, Kim D, et al. Lack of predictive value of tachypnea
in the diagnosis of pneumonia in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2010;
29:406–9.
57. Murtagh P, Cerqueiro C, Halac A, et al. Acute lower respiratory in-
fection in Argentinian children: a 40 month clinical and epidemio-
logical study. Pediatr Pulmonol 1993; 16:1–8.
58. Flores G, Abreu M, Chaisson CE, et al. Keeping children out of
hospitals: parents’ and physicians’ perspectives on how pediatric
hospitalizations for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions can be
avoided. Pediatrics 2003; 112:1021–30.
59. Agha MM, Glazier RH, Guttmann A. Relationship between social
inequalities and ambulatory care-sensitive hospitalizations persists for
up to 9 years among children born in a major Canadian urban center.
Ambul Pediatr 2007; 7:258–62.
60. Castaldo ET, Yang EY. Severe sepsis attributable to community-
associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus : an emerging
fatal problem. Am Surg 2007; 73:684–7discussion 87–8.
61. Gonzalez BE, Martinez-Aguilar G, Hulten KG, et al. Severe staphylo-
coccal sepsis in adolescents in the era of community-acquired
methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. Pediatrics 2005;1 1 5 : 6 4 2 – 8 .
62. Tan TQ, Mason EO Jr., Barson WJ, et al. Clinical characteristics and
outcome of children with pneumonia attributable to penicillin-
susceptible and penicillin-nonsusceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae .
Pediatrics 1998; 102:1369–75.
63. Bender JM, Ampofo K, Gesteland P, et al. Development and valida-
tion of a risk score for predicting hospitalization in children with
influenza virus infection. Pediatr Emerg Care 2009; 25:369–75.
64. Louie JK, Schechter R, Honarmand S, et al. Severe pediatric influenza
in California, 2003–2005: implications for immunization recom-
mendations. Pediatrics 2006; 117:e610–8.
65. von Renesse A, Schildgen O, Klinkenberg D, et al. Respiratory syn-
cytial virus infection in children admitted to hospital but ventilated
mechanically for other reasons. J Med Virol 2009; 81:160–6.
66. Graf JM, Montagnino BA, Hueckel R, et al. Pediatric tracheostomies:
a recent experience from one academic center. Pediatr Crit Care Med
2008; 9:96–100.
67. US Bureau of the Census. Statistical abstract of the United States.
127th ed. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 2008;
159.
68. Shann F, Barker J, Poore P. Clinical signs that predict death in chil-
dren with severe pneumonia. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1989; 8:852–5.
69. Sebastian R, Skowronski DM, Chong M, et al. Age-related trends in
the timeliness and prediction of medical visits, hospitalizations and
deaths due to pneumonia and influenza, British Columbia, Canada,
1998–2004. Vaccine 2008; 26:1397–403.
70. Duncan H, Hutchison J, Parshuram CS. The Pediatric Early Warning
System score: a severity of illness score to predict urgent medical need
in hospitalized children. J Crit Care 2006; 21:271–8.
71. Campbell H, Byass P, Lamont AC, et al. Assessment of clinical criteria
for identification of severe acute lower respiratory tract infections in
children. Lancet 1989; 1:297–9.
72. Techasaensiri B, Techasaensiri C, Mejias A, et al. Viral coinfections
in children with invasive pneumoco ccal disease. Pediatr Infect Dis
J 2009; 29:519–23.
73. Lynch T, Bialy L, Kellner JD, et al. A systematic review on the di-
agnosis of pediatric bacterial pneumonia: when gold is bronze. PLoS
One 2010; 5:e11989.
74. Hickey RW, Bowman MJ, Smith GA. Utility of blood cultures in
pediatric patients found to have pneumonia in the emergency de-
partment. Ann Emerg Med 1996; 27:721–5.
75. Shah SS, Alpern ER, Zwerling L, et al. Risk of bacteremia in young
children with pneumonia treated as outpatients. Arch Pediatr Adolesc
Med 2003; 157:389–92.
76. Claesson BA, Trollfors B, Brolin I, et al. Etiology of community-
acquired pneumonia in children based on antibody responses to
bacterial and viral antigens. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1989; 8:856–62.
77. Tsarouhas N, Shaw KN, Hodinka RL, et al. Effectiveness of in-
tramuscular penicillin versus oral amoxicillin in the early treatment
of outpatient pediatric pneumonia. Pediatr Emerg Care 1998;
14:338–41.
78. Bonadio WA. Bacteremia in febrile children with lobar pneumonia
and leukocytosis. Pediatr Emerg Care 1988; 4:241–2.
79. Black SB, Shinefield HR, Ling S, et al. Effectiveness of heptavalent
pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in children younger than five years
of age for prevention of pneumonia. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2002;
21:810–5.
80. Shah SS, Dugan MH, Bell LM, et al. Blood cultures in the emergency
department evaluation of childhood pneumonia. Pediatr Infect Dis
J 2011; 30:475–79.
81. Alpern ER, Alessandrini EA, Bell LM, et al. Occult bacteremia from
a pediatric emergency department: current prevalence, time to de-
tection, and outcome. Pediatrics 2000; 106:505–11.
82. Stoll ML, Rubin LG. Incidence o f occult bacteremia among highly
febrile young children in the era of the pneumococcal conjugate
vaccine: a study from a Children’s Hospital Emergency De-
partment and Urgent Care Center. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2004;
158:671–5.
83. Herz AM, Greenhow TL, Alcantara J, et al. Changing epidemiology of
outpatient bacteremia in 3- to 36-month-old children after the in-
troduction of the heptavalent-conjugated pneumococcal vaccine.
Pediatr Infect Dis J 2006; 25:293–300.
84. Sard B, Bailey MC, Vinci R. An analysis of pediatric blood cultures in
the postpneumococcal conjugate vaccine era in a community hospital
emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care 2006; 22:295–300.
85. Mtunthama N, Gordon SB, Kusimbwe T, et al. Blood culture col-
lection technique and pneumococcal surveillance in Malawi during
the four year period 2003–2006: an observational study. BMC Infect
Dis 2008; 8:137.
86. Petti CA, Woods CW, Reller LB. Streptococcus pneumoniae antigen
test using positive blood culture bottles as an alternative method
to diagnose pneumococcal bacteremia. J Clin Microbiol 2005;4 3 :
2510–2.




87. Resti M, Micheli A, Moriondo M, et al. Comparison of the effect of
antibiotic treatment on the possibility of diagnosing invasive pneu-
mococcal disease by culture or molecular methods: a prospective,
observational study of children and adolescents with proven pneu-
mococcal infection. Clin Ther 2009; 31:1266–73.
88. Sandora TJ, Desai R, Miko BA, et al. Assessing quality indicators for
pediatric community-acquired pneumonia. Am J Med Qual 2009;
24:419–27.
89. Byington CL, Spencer LY, Johnson TA, et al. An epidemiological
investigation of a sustained high rate of pediatric parapneumonic
empyema: risk factors and microbiological associations. Clin Infect
Dis 2002; 34:434–40.
90. Freij BJ, Kusmiesz H, Nelson JD, et al. Parapneumonic effusions and
empyema in hospitalized children: a retrospective review of 227 cases.
Pediatr Infect Dis 1984; 3:578–91.
91. Hoff SJ, Neblett WW, Edwards KM, et al. Parapneumonic empyema
in children: decortication hastens recovery in patients with severe
pleural infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1991; 10:194–9.
92. St Peter SD, Tsao K, Spilde TL, et al. Thoracoscopic decortication vs
tube thoracostomy with fibrinolysis for empyema in children:
a prospective, randomized trial. J Pediatr Surg 2009; 44:106–11;
discussion 11.
93. Buckingham SC, King MD, Miller ML. Incidence and etiologies of
complicated parapneumonic effusions in children, 1996 to 2001.
Pediatr Infect Dis J 2003; 22:499–504.
94. Campbell SG, Marrie TJ, Anstey R, et al. The contribution of blood
cultures to the clinical management of adult patients admitted to the
hospital with community-acquired pneumonia: a prospective obser-
vational study. Chest 2003; 123:1142–50.
95. Corbo J, Friedman B, Bijur P, et al. Limited usefulness of initial blood
cultures in community acquired pneumonia. Emerg Med J 2004;
21:446–8.
96. Kennedy M, Bates DW, Wright SB, et al. Do emergency department
blood cultures change practice in patients with pneumonia? Ann
Emerg Med 2005; 46:393–400.
97. Afshar N, Tabas J, Afshar K, et al. Blood cultures for community-
acquired pneumonia: are they worthy of two quality measures?
A systematic review. J Hosp Med 2009; 4:112–23.
98. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Licensure of a 13-valent
pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) and recommendations for
use among children: Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices
(ACIP), 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2010; 59:258–61.
99. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Invasive pneumococcal
disease in young children before licensure of 13-valent pneumococcal
conjugate vaccine: United States, 2007. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly
Rep 2010; 59:253–7.
100. Ishida T, Hashimoto T, Arita M, et al. A 3-year prospective study of
a urinary antigen-detection test for Streptococcus pneumoniae in
community-acquired pneumonia: utility and clinical impact on the
reported etiology. J Infect Chemother 2004; 10:359–63.
101. Roson B, Fernandez-Sabe N, Carratala J, et al. Contribution of a uri-
nary antigen assay (Binax NOW) to the early diagnosis of pneumo-
coccal pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 38:222–6.
102. Neuman MI, Harper MB. Evaluation of a rapid urine antigen assay for
the detection of invasive pneumococcal disease in children. Pediatrics
2003; 112:1279–82.
103. Dowell SF, Garman RL, Liu G, et al. Evaluation of Binax NOW,
an assay for the detection of pneumococcal antigen in urine
samples, performed among pediatric patients. Clin Infect Dis 2001;
32:824–5.
104. Esposito S, Bosis S, Colombo R, et al. Evaluation of rapid assay for
detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae urinary antigen among infants
and young children with possible invasive pneumococcal disease.
Pediatr Infect Dis J 2004; 23:365–7.
105. Charkaluk ML, Kalach N, Mvogo H, et al. Assessment of a rapid
urinary antigen detection by an immunochromatographic test for
diagnosis of pneumococcal infection in children. Diagn Microbiol
Infect Dis 2006; 55:89–94.
106. Bonner AB, Monroe KW, Talley LI, et al. Impact of the rapid diagnosis
of influenza on physician decision-making and patient management
in the pediatric emergency department: results of a randomized,
prospective, controlled trial. Pediatrics 2003; 112:363–7.
107. Esposito S, Marchisio P, Morelli P, et al. Effect of a rapid influenza
diagnosis. Arch Dis Child 2003; 88:525–6.
108. Iyer SB, Gerber MA, Pomerantz WJ, et al. Effect of point-of-care
influenza testing on management of febrile children. Acad Emerg Med
2006; 13:1259–68.
109. Benito-Fernandez J, Vazquez-Ronco MA, Morteruel-Aizkuren E, et al.
Impact of rapid viral testing for influenza A and B viruses on man-
agement of febrile infants without signs of focal infection. Pediatr
Infect Dis J 2006; 25:1153–7.
110. Abanses JC, Dowd MD, Simon SD, et al. Impact of rapid influenza
testing at triage on management of febrile infants and young children.
Pediatr Emerg Care 2006; 22:145–9.
111. Doan QH, Kissoon N, Dobson S, et al. A randomized, controlled trial
of the impact of early and rapid diagnosis of viral infections in chil-
dren brought to an emergency department with febrile respiratory
tract illnesses. J Pediatr 2009; 154:91–5.
112. Falsey AR, Murata Y, Walsh EE. Impact of rapid diagnosis on man-
agement of adults hospitalized with influenza. Arch Intern Med 2007;
167:354–60.
113. Byington CL, Castillo H, Gerber K, et al. The effect of rapid re-
spiratory viral diagnostic testing on antibiotic use in a children’s
hospital. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002; 156:1230–4.
114. Louie JK, Guevara H, Boston E, et al. Rapid influenza antigen test for
diagnosis of pandemic (H1N1) 2009. Emerg Infect Dis 2010;1 6 : 8 2 4 – 6 .
115. Bhat N, Wright JG, Broder KR, et al. Influenza-associated deaths
among children in the United States, 2003–2004. N Engl J Med 2005;
353:2559–67.
116. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Surveillance for pediatric
deaths associated with 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus in-
fection: United States, April–August 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal
Wkly Rep 2009; 58:941–7.
117. Levin D, Tribuzio M, Green-Wrzesinki T, et al. Empiric antibiotics are
justified for infants with respiratory syncytial virus lower respiratory
tract infection presenting with respiratory failure: a prospective study
and evidence review. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2010; 11:390–5.
118. Block S, Hedrick J, Hammerschlag MR, et al. Mycoplasma pneumoniae
and Chlamydia pneumoniae in pediatric community-acquired pneu-
monia: comparative efficacy and safety of clarithromycin vs. eryth-
romycin ethylsuccinate. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1995; 14:471–7.
119. Gendrel D. Antibiotic treatment of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in-
fections. Pediatr Pulmonol Suppl 1997; 16:46–7.
120. Harris JA, Kolokathis A, Campbell M, et al. Safety and efficacy of
azithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in
children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1998; 17:865–71.
121. Korppi M, Heiskanen-Kosma T, Kleemola M. Incidence of community-
acquired pneumonia in children caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae:
serological results of a prospective, population-based study in primary
health care. Respirology 2004; 9:109–14.
122. Glezen WP, Loda FA, Clyde WA Jr, et al. Epidemiologic patterns of
acute lower respiratory disease of children in a pediatric group
practice. J Pediatr 1971; 78:397–406.
123. Marmion BP. Eaton agent–science and scientific acceptance: a his-
torical commentary. Rev Infect Dis 1990; 12:338–53.
124. Alexander TS, Gray LD, Kraft JA, et al. Performance of Meridian
ImmunoCard Mycoplasma test in a multicenter clinical trial. J Clin
Microbiol 1996; 34:1180–3.
125. Dunn JJ, Malan AK, Evans J, et al. Rapid detection of Mycoplasma
pneumoniae IgM antibodies in pediatric patients using ImmunoCard
Mycoplasma compared to conventional enzyme immunoassays. Eur
J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2004; 23:412–4.




126. Thurman KA, Walter ND, Schwartz SB, et al. Comparison of labo-
ratory diagnostic procedures for detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae
in community outbreaks. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 48:1244–9.
127. Waris ME, Toikka P, Saarinen T, et al. Diagnosis of Mycoplasma
pneumoniae pneumonia in children. J Clin Microbiol 1998;3 6 : 3 1 5 5 – 9 .
128. Bernet C, Garret M, de Barbeyrac B, et al. Detection of Mycoplasma
pneumoniae by using the polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol
1989; 27:2492–6.
129. Hardegger D, Nadal D, Bossart W, et al. Rapid detection of Myco-
plasma pneumoniae in clinical samples by real-time PCR. J Microbiol
Methods 2000; 41:45–51.
130. Jensen JS, Sondergard-Andersen J, Uldum SA, et al. Detection of
Mycoplasma pneumoniae in simulated clinical samples by polymerase
chain reaction. Brief report. APMIS 1989; 97:1046–8.
131. Luneberg E, Jensen JS, Frosch M. Detection of Mycoplasma pneu-
moniae by polymerase chain reaction and nonradioactive hybridiza-
tion in microtiter plates. J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31:1088–94.
132. Nadala D, Bossart W, Zucol F, et al. Community-acquired pneumonia
in children due to Mycoplasma pneumoniae: diagnostic performance of
a seminested 16S rDNA-PCR. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis2001; 39:15–9.
133. Dowell SF, Peeling RW, Boman J, et al. Standardizing Chlamydia
pneumoniae assays: recommendations from the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (USA) and the Laboratory Centre for Disease
Control (Canada). Clin Infect Dis 2001; 33:492–503.
134. Copelovitch L, Kaplan BS. Streptococcus pneumoniae –associated he-
molytic uremic syndrome: classification and the emergence of sero-
type 19A. Pediatrics 2010; 125:e174–82.
135. Waters AM, Kerecuk L, Luk D, et al. Hemolytic uremic syndrome
associated with invasive pneumococcal disease: the United Kingdom
experience. J Pediatr 2007; 151:140–4.
136. Brandt J, Wong C, Mihm S, et al. Invasive pneumococcal disease and
hemolytic uremic syndrome. Pediatrics 2002; 110:371–6.
137. Bender JM, Ampofo K, Byington CL, et al. Epidemiology of Strepto-
coccus pneumoniae -induced hemolytic uremic syndrome in Utah
children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2010; 29:712–6.
138. Korppi M, Heiskanen-Kosma T, Leinonen M. White blood cells,
C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in pneumo-
coccal pneumonia in children. Eur Respir J 1997; 10:1125–9.
139. Bachur R, Perry H, Harper MB. Occult pneumonias: empiric chest
radiographs in febrile children with leukocytosis. Ann Emerg Med
1999; 33:166–73.
140. Murphy CG, van de Pol AC, Harper MB, et al. Clinical predictors of
occult pneumonia in the febrile child. Acad Emerg Med 2007;
14:243–9.
141. Rutman MS, Bachur R, Harper MB. Radiographic pneumonia in
young, highly febrile children with leukocytosis before and after
universal conjugate pneumococcal vaccination. Pediatr Emerg Care
2009; 25:1–7.
142. Nohynek H, Valkeila E, Leinonen M, et al. Erythrocyte sedimentation
rate, white blood cell count and serum C-reactive protein in assessing
etiologic diagnosis of acute lower respiratory infections in children.
Pediatr Infect Dis J 1995; 14:484–90.
143. Korppi M, Remes S. Serum procalcitonin in pneumococcal pneu-
monia in children. Eur Respir J 2001; 17:623–7.
144. Korppi M, Remes S, Heiskanen-Kosma T. Serum procalcitonin
concentrations in bacterial pneumonia in children: a negative result in
primary healthcare settings. Pediatr Pulmonol 2003; 35:56–61.
145. Toikka P, Irjala K, Juven T, et al. Serum procalcitonin, C-reactive
protein and interleukin-6 for distinguishing bacterial and viral
pneumonia in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2000; 19:598–602.
146. Moulin F, Raymond J, Lorrot M, et al. Procalcitonin in children
admitted to hospital with community acquired pneumonia. Arch Dis
Child 2001; 84:332–6.
147. Khan DA, Rahman A, Khan FA. Is procalcitonin better than C-
reactive protein for early diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia in chil-
dren? J Clin Lab Anal 2010; 24:1–5.
148. Prat C, Dominguez J, Rodrigo C, et al. Procalcitonin, C-reactive
protein and leukocyte count in children with lower respiratory tract
infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2003; 22:963–8.
149. Nascimento-Carvalho CM, Cardoso MR, Barral A, et al. Procalcitonin
is useful in identifying bacteraemia among children with pneumonia.
Scand J Infect Dis 2010; 42:644–9.
150. Swingler GH, Zwarenstein M. Chest radiograph in acute respiratory
infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; 23:CD001268.
151. Swingler GH, Hussey GD, Zwarenstein M. Randomised controlled
trial of clinical outcome after chest radiograph in ambulatory acute
lower-respiratory infection in children. Lancet 1998; 351:404–8.
152. Novack V, Avnon LS, Smolyakov A, et al. Disagreement in the in-
terpretation of chest radiographs among specialists and clinical out-
comes of patients hospitalized with suspected pneumonia. Eur
J Intern Med 2006; 17:43–7.
153. Alario AJ, McCarthy PL, Markowitz R, et al. Usefulness of chest ra-
diographs in children with acute lower respiratory tract disease.
J Pediatr 1987; 111:187–93.
154. Grossman LK, Caplan SE. Clinical, laboratory, and radiological in-
formation in the diagnosis of pneumonia in children. Ann Emerg Med
1988; 17:43–6.
155. Bushyhead JB, Wood RW, Tompkins RK, et al. The effect of chest
radiographs on the management and clinical course of patients with
acute cough. Med Care 1983; 21:661–73.
156. Mathews B, Shah S, Cleveland RH, et al. Clinical predictors of
pneumonia among children with wheezing. Pediatrics 2009; 124:
e29–36.
157. Homier V, Bellavance C, Xhignesse M. Prevalence of pneumonia in
children under 12 years of age who undergo abdominal radiography
in the emergency department. CJEM 2007; 9:347–51.
158. Bloomfield FH, Teele RL, Voss M, et al. Inter- and intra-observer
variability in the assessment of atelectasis and consolidation in neo-
natal chest radiographs. Pediatr Radiol 1999; 29:459–62.
159. Albaum MN, Hill LC, Murphy M, et al. Interobserver reliability of the
chest radiograph in community-acquired pneumonia. PORT Inves-
tigators. Chest 1996; 110:343–50.
160. Johnson J, Kline JA. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement of the
interpretation of pediatric chest radiographs. Emerg Radiol 2010;
17:285–90.
161. Hopstaken RM, Witbraad T, van Engelshoven JM, et al. Inter-
observer variation in the interpretation of chest radiographs for
pneumonia in community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections.
Clin Radiol 2004; 59:743–52.
162. Tudor GR, Finlay D, Taub N. An assessment of inter-observer
agreement and accuracy when reporting plain radiographs. Clin Ra-
diol 1997; 52:235–8.
163. Stickler GB, Hoffman AD, Taylor WF. Problems in the clinical and
roentgenographic diagnosis of pneumonia in young children. Clin
Pediatr (Phila) 1984; 23:398–9.
164. Davies HD, Wang EE, Manson D, et al. Reliability of the chest ra-
diograph in the diagnosis of lower respiratory infections in young
children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1996; 15:600–4.
165. Young M, Marrie TJ. Interobserver variability in the interpretation of
chest roentgenograms of patients with possible pneumonia. Arch
Intern Med 1994; 154:2729–32.
166. Cherian T, Mulholland EK, Carlin JB, et al. Standardized in-
terpretation of paediatric chest radiographs for the diagnosis of
pneumonia in epidemiological studies. Bull World Health Organ
2005; 83:353–9.
167. Gatt ME, Spectre G, Paltiel O, et al. Chest radiographs in the
emergency department: is the radiologist really necessary? Postgrad
Med J 2003; 79:214–7.
168. Gibson NA, Hollman AS, Paton JY. Value of radiological follow up of
childhood pneumonia. BMJ 1993; 307:1117.
169. Virkki R, Juven T, Mertsola J, et al. Radiographic follow-up of
pneumonia in children. Pediatr Pulmonol 2005; 40:223–7.




170. Grossman LK, Wald ER, Nair P, et al. Roentgenographic follow-up of
acute pneumonia in children. Pediatrics 1979; 63:30–1.
171. Wacogne I, Negrine RJ. Are follow up chest x ray examinations helpful
in the management of children recovering from pneumonia? Arch Dis
Child 2003; 88:457–8.
172. Heaton P, Arthur K. The utility of chest radiography in the follow-up
of pneumonia. N Z Med J 1998; 111:315–7.
173. Bruns AH, Oosterheert JJ, Prokop M, et al. Patterns of resolution
of chest radiograph abnormalities in adults hospitalized with
severe community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 45:
983–91.
174. Fiorino EK, Panitch HB. Recurrent pneumonia. In: Shah SS, ed. Pe-
diatric practice: infectious diseases. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical,
2009: 321–31.
175. Uyeki T. Diagnostic testing for 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1)
virus infection in hospitalized patients. New Engl J Med 2009;
361:e114.
176. Bar-Zohar D, Sivan Y. The yield of flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy in
pediatric intensive care patients. Chest 2004; 126:1353–9.
177. Tang LF, Chen ZM. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy in neonatal and pedi-
atric intensive care units: a 5-year experience. Med Princ Pract 2009;
18:305–9.
178. Manali E, Papadopoulos A, Tsiodras S, et al. The impact on com-
munity acquired pneumonia empirical therapy of diagnostic bron-
choscopic techniques. Scand J Infect Dis 2008; 40:286–92.
179. Fagon JY, Chastre J, Wolff M, et al. Invasive and noninvasive
strategies for management of suspected ventilator-associated pneu-
monia. A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2000; 132:621–30.
180. Chastre J, Fagon JY. Ventilator-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir
Crit Care Med 2002; 165:867–903.
181. Gauvin F, Lacroix J, Guertin MC, et al. Reproducibility of blind
protected bronchoalveolar lavage in mechanically ventilated children.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 165:1618–23.
182. Labenne M, Poyart C, Rambaud C, et al. Blind protected specimen
brush and bronchoalveolar lavage in ventilated children. Crit Care
Med 1999; 27:2537–43.
183. Vuori-Holopainen E, Salo E, Saxen H, et al. Etiological diagnosis of
childhood pneumonia by use of tran sthoracic needle aspiration
and modern microbiological methods. Clin Infect Dis 2002;
34:583–90.
184. Manhire A, Charig M, Clelland C, et al. Guidelines for radiologically
guided lung biopsy. Thorax 2003; 58:920–36.
185. Kornecki A, Shemie SD. Open lung biopsy in children with re-
spiratory failure. Crit Care Med 2001; 29:1247–50.
186. Acosta EP, Kimberlin DW. Determination of appropriate dosing of
influenza drugs in pediatric patients. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2010.
187. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Infectious Diseases.
Policy statement: recommendations for prevention and control of
influenza in children, 2010–2011. Pediatrics 2010; 126:816–26.
188. Klein JO. Bacterial pneumonias. In: Cherry J, Kaplan S, Demmler-
Harrison G eds. Feigin & Cherry’s textbook of pediatric infectious dis-
eases, 6th ed. Vol 1. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/Elsevier, 2009; 302–14.
189. Weinstein MP, Klugman KP, Jones RN. Rationale for revised peni-
cillin susceptibility breakpoints versus Streptococcus pneumoniae :
coping with antimicrobial susceptibility in an era of resistance. Clin
Infect Dis 2009; 48:1596–600.
190. Dagan R, Hoberman A, Johnson C, et al. Bacteriologic and clinical
efficacy of high dose amoxicillin/clavulanate in children with acute
otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2001; 20:829–37.
191. Hazir T, Qazi SA, Bin Nisar Y, et al. Comparison of standard versus
double dose of amoxicillin in the treatment of non-severe pneu-
monia in children aged 2–59 months: a multi-centre, double blind,
randomised controlled trial in Pakistan. Arch Dis Child 2007;
92:291–7.
192. Bradley JS, Garonzik SM, Forrest A, et al. Pharmacokinetics, phar-
macodynamics, and Monte Carlo simulation: selecting the best anti-
microbial dose to treat an infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2010;
29:1043–6.
193. Bradley JS, Garonzik SM, Forrest A, et al. Pharmacokinetics, phar-
macodynamics, and Monte Carlo simulation: selecting the best anti-
microbial dose to treat an infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2010;
29:1043–46.
194. Kyaw MH, Lynfield R, Schaffner W, et al. Effect of introduction of the
pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on drug-resistant Streptococcus
pneumoniae. N Engl J Med 2006; 354:1455–63.
195. Harrison CJ, Woods C, Stout G, et al. Susceptibilities of Haemo-
philus influenzae , Streptococcus pneumoniae, including serotype
19A, and Moraxella catarrhalis paediatric isolates from 2005 to
2007 to commonly used antibiotics. J Antimicrob Chemother 2009;
63:511–9.
196. Morita JY, Kahn E, Thompson T, et al. Impact of azithromycin on
oropharyngeal carriage of group A Streptococcus and nasopharyngeal
carriage of macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae . Pediatr
Infect Dis J 2000; 19:41–6.
197. Sader HS, Jacobs MR, Fritsche TR. Review of the spectrum and po-
tency of orally administered cephalosporins and amoxicillin/
clavulanate. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2007; 57:5S–12S.
198. Pallares R, Capdevila O, Linares J, et al. The effect of cephalosporin
resistance on mortality in adult patients with nonmeningeal systemic
pneumococcal infections. Am J Med 2002; 113:120–6.
199. Roson B, Carratala J, Tubau F, et al. Usefulness of betalactam therapy
for community-acquired pneumonia in the era of drug-resistant
Streptococcus pneumoniae : a randomized study of amoxicillin-
clavulanate and ceftriaxone. Microb Drug Resist 2001; 7:85–96.
200. Chumpa A, Bachur RG, Harper MB. Bacteremia-associated pneu-
mococcal pneumonia and the benefit of initial parenteral anti-
microbial therapy. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1999; 18:1081–5.
201. Lappin E, Ferguson AJ. Gram-positive toxic shock syndromes. Lancet
Infect Dis 2009; 9:281–90.
202. Forrest GN, Tamura K. Rifampin combination therapy for non-
mycobacterial infections. Clin Microbiol Rev 2010; 23:14–34.
203. Como-Sabetti K, Harriman KH, Buck JM, et al. Community-associated
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: trends in case and isolate
characteristics from six years of prospective surveillance. Public Health
Rep 2009; 124:427–35.
204. Miller LG, Kaplan SL. Staphylococcus aureus: a community pathogen.
Infect Dis Clin North Am 2009; 23:35–52.
205. Mulholland S, Gavranich JB, Chang AB. Antibiotics for community-
acquired lower respiratory tract infections secondary to Mycoplasma
pneumoniae in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;
7:CD004875.
206. Matsubara K, Morozumi M, Okada T, et al. A comparative clinical study
of macrolide-sensitive and macrolide-resistantMycoplasma pneumoniae
infections in pediatric patients. J Infect Chemother2009; 15:380–3.
207. Kingston JR, Chanock RM, Mufson MA, et al. Eaton agent pneu-
monia. JAMA 1961; 176:118–23.
208. Rasch JR, Mogabgab WJ. Therapeutic effect of erythromycin on
Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother
(Bethesda) 1965; 5:693–9.
209. Plouffe JF. Importance of atypical pathogens of community-acquired
pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 2000; 31(Suppl 2):S35–9.
210. Bradley JS, Arguedas A, Blumer JL, et al. Comparative study of
levofloxacin in the treatment of children with community-acquired
pneumonia. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2007; 26:868–78.
211. Burillo A, Bouza E. Chlamydophila pneumoniae. Infect Dis Clin North
Am 2010; 24:61–71.
212. Hammerschlag MR. Pneumonia due to Chlamydia pneumoniae in
children: epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Pediatr Pulmonol
2003; 36:384–90.
213. Heinonen S, Silvennoinen H, Lehtinen P, et al. Early oseltamivir
treatment of influenza in children 1-3 years of age: a randomized
controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis 2010; 51:887–94.




214. McGeer A, Green KA, Plevneshi A, et al. Antiviral therapy and out-
comes of influenza requiring hospitalization in Ontario, Canada. Clin
Infect Dis 2007; 45:1568–75.
215. Siston AM, Rasmussen SA, Honein MA, et al. Pandemic 2009 in-
fluenza A(H1N1) virus illness among pregnant women in the United
States. JAMA 2010; 303:1517–25.
216. Farias JA, Fernandez A, Monteverde E, et al. Critically ill infants and
children with influenza A (H1N1) in pediatric intensive care units in
Argentina. Intensive Care Med 2010; 36:1015–22.
217. Lee N, Choi KW, Chan PK, et al. Outcomes of adults hospitalised with
severe influenza. Thorax 2010; 65:510–5.
218. Wildschut ED, de Hoog M, Ahsman MJ, et al. Plasma concentrations
of oseltamivir and oseltamivir carboxylate in critically ill children on
extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. PLoS One 2010;
5:e10938.
219. Harper SA, Bradley JS, Englund JA, et al. Seasonal influenza in adults
and children: diagnosis, treatment, chemoprophylaxis, and in-
stitutional outbreak management: clinical practice guidelines of the
Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2009;
48:1003–32.
220. Committee on Infectious Diseases. From the American Academy of
Pediatrics: policy statements—modified recommendations for use of
palivizumab for prevention of respiratory syncytial virus infections.
Pediatrics 2009; 124:1694–701.
221. Carbonell-Estrany X, Simoes EA, Dagan R, et al. Motavizumab for
prophylaxis of respiratory syncytial virus in high-risk children:
a noninferiority trial. Pediatrics 2010; 125:e35–51.
222. Patel SJ, Larson EL, Kubin CJ, et al. A review of antimicrobial control
strategies in hospitalized and ambulatory pediatric populations. Pe-
diatr Infect Dis J 2007; 26:531–7.
223. Haider BA, Saeed MA, Bhutta ZA. Short-course versus long-course
antibiotic therapy for non-severe community-acquired pneumonia in
children aged 2 months to 59 months. Cochrane Database Syst Rev
2008; 16:CD005976.
224. Tice AD, Rehm SJ, Dalovisio JR, et al. Practice guidelines for out-
patient parenteral antimicrobial therapy. IDSA guidelines. Clin Infect
Dis 2004; 38:1651–72.
225. Bradley JS, Ching DK, Hart CL. Invasive bacterial disease in child-
hood: efficacy of oral antibiotic therapy following short course par-
enteral therapy in non-central nervous system infections. Pediatr
Infect Dis J 1987; 6:821–5.
226. Blaschke AJ, Heyrend C, Byington CL, et al. Molecular analysis im-
proves pathogen identification and epidemiologic study of pediatric
parapneumonic empyema. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2011; 30:289–94.
227. Spellberg B, Talbot GH, Brass EP, et al. Position paper: recommended
design features of future clinical trials of antibacterial agents for
community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 2008;4 7 ( S u p p l3 ) :
S249–65.
228. Bradley JS, McCracken GH. Unique considerations in the evaluation
of antibacterials in clinical trials for pediatric community-acquired
pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 47(Suppl 3):S241–8.
229. Hasley PB, Albaum MN, Li YH, et al. Do pulmonary radiographic
findings at presentation predict mortality in patients with
community-acquired pneu monia? Arch Intern Med 1996;
156:2206–12.
230. Senstad AC, Suren P, Brauteset L, et al. Community-acquired pneu-
monia (CAP) in children in Oslo, Norway. Acta Paediatr2009; 98:332–6.
231. Clark JE, Hammal D, Spencer D, et al. Children with pneumonia: how
do they present and how are they managed? Arch Dis Child 2007;
92:394–8.
232. Bueno Campana M, Agundez Reigosa B, Jimeno Ruiz S, et al. Is the
incidence of parapneumonic pleural effusion increasing? Pediatr
(Barc) 2008; 68:92–8.
233. Weigl JA, Puppe W, Belke O, et al. Population-based incidence of
severe pneumonia in children in Kiel, Germany. Klin Padiatr 2005;
217:211–9.
234. Fine NL, Smith LR, Sheedy PF. Frequency of pleural effusions in
mycoplasma and viral pneumonias. N Engl J Med 1970; 283:790–3.
235. Light RW. Pleural diseases. Dis Mon 1992; 38:261–331.
236. Byington CL, Korgenski K, Daly J, et al. Impact of the pneumococcal
conjugate vaccine on pneumococcal parapneumonic empyema. Pe-
diatr Infect Dis J 2006; 25:250–4.
237. Byington CL, Samore MH, Stoddard GJ, et al. Temporal trends of
invasive disease due to Streptococcus pneumoniae among children in
the intermountain west: emergence of nonvaccine serogroups. Clin
Infect Dis 2005; 41:21–9.
238. Hendrickson DJ, Blumberg DA, Joad JP, et al. Five-fold increase in
pediatric parapneumonic empyema since introduction of pneu-
mococcal conjugate vacci ne. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2008; 27:
1030–2.
239. Lahti E, Peltola V, Virkki R, et al. Development of parapneumonic
empyema in children. Acta Paediatr 2007; 96:1686–92.
240. Chan W, Keyser-Gauvin E, Davis GM, et al. Empyema thoracis in
children: a 26-year review of the Montreal Children’s Hospital ex-
perience. J Pediatr Surg 1997; 32:870–2.
241. Balfour-Lynn IM, Abrahamson E, Cohen G, et al. BTS guidelines for
the management of pleural infection in children. Thorax 2005;
60(Suppl 1):i1–21.
242. Light RW. Parapneumonic effusions and empyema. Proc Am Thorac
Soc 2006; 3:75–80.
243. Colice GL, Curtis A, Deslauriers J, et al. Medical and surgical treat-
ment of parapneumonic effusions: an evidence-based guideline. Chest
2000; 118:1158–71.
244. Prais D, Kuzmenko E, Amir J, et al. Association of hypoalbuminemia
with the presence and size of pleural effusion in children with
pneumonia. Pediatrics 2008; 121:e533–8.
245. Carter E, Waldhausen J, Zhang W, et al. Management of children with
empyema: pleural drainage is not always necessary. Pediatr Pulmonol
2010; 45:475–80.
246. Ferguson AD, Prescott RJ, Selkon JB, et al. The clinical course and
management of thoracic empyema. QJM 1996; 89:285–9.
247. Ramnath RR, Heller RM, Ben-Ami T, et al. Implications of early
sonographic evaluation of parapneumonic effusions in children with
pneumonia. Pediatrics 1998; 101:68–71.
248. Himelman RB, Callen PW. The prognostic value of loculations in
parapneumonic pleural effusions. Chest 1986; 90:852–6.
249. Casado Flores J, Nieto Moro M, Berron S, et al. Usefulness of pneu-
mococcal antigen detection in pleural effusion for the rapid diagnosis
of infection by Streptococcus pneumoniae. Eur J Pediatr 2009.
250. Obando I, Munoz-Almagro C, Arroyo LA, et al. Pediatric para-
pneumonic empyema, Spain. Emerg Infect Dis 2008; 14:1390–7.
251. Goldbart AD, Leibovitz E, Porat N, et al. Complicated community
acquired pneumonia in children prior to the introduction of the
pneumococcal conjugated vaccine. Scand J Infect Dis 2009;
41:182–7.
252. Kunyoshi V, Cataneo DC, Cataneo AJ. Complicated pneumonias with
empyema and/or pneumatocele in children. Pediatr Surg Int 2006;
22:186–90.
253. Schultz KD, Fan LL, Pinsky J, et al. The changing face of pleural
empyemas in children: epidemiology and management. Pediatrics
2004; 113:1735–40.
254. Hernandez-Bou S, Garcia-Garcia JJ, Esteva C, et al. Pediatric
parapneumonic pleural effusion: epidemiology, clinical character-
istics, and microbiological diagnosis. Pediatr Pulmonol 2009;4 4 :
1192–200.
255. Ani A, Okpe S, Akambi M, et al. Comparison of a DNA based PCR
method with conventional methods for the detection of M. tuber-
culosis in Jos, Nigeria. J Infect Dev Ctries 2009; 3:470–5.
256. Le Monnier A, Carbonnelle E, Zahar JR, et al. Microbiological di-
agnosis of empyema in children: comparative evaluations by culture,
polymerase chain reaction, and pneumococcal antigen detection in
pleural fluids. Clin Infect Dis 2006; 42:1135–40.




257. Ploton C, Freydiere AM, Benito Y, et al. Streptococcus pneumoniae
thoracic empyema in children: rapid diagnosis by using the Binax
NOW immunochromatographic membrane test in pleural fluids.
Pathol Biol (Paris) 2006; 54:498–501.
258. Tarrago D, Fenoll A, Sanchez-Tatay D, et al. Identification of pneu-
mococcal serotypes from culture-negative clinical specimens by novel
real-time PCR. Clin Microbiol Infect 2008; 14:828–34.
259. Ampofo K, Herbener A, Blaschke AJ, et al. Association of 2009 pan-
demic influenza A (H1N1) infection and increased hospitalization
with parapneumonic empyema in children in Utah. Pediatr Infect Dis
J 2010; 29:905–9.
260. Lahti E, Mertsola J, Kontiokari T, et al. Pneumolysin polymerase
chain reaction for diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia and em-
pyema in children. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2006; 25:783–9.
261. Heffner JE, Brown LK, Barbieri C, et al. Pleural fluid chemical analysis
in parapneumonic effusions. A meta-analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care
Med 1995; 151:1700–8.
262. Mitri RK, Brown SD, Zurakowski D, et al. Outcomes of primary
image-guided drainage of parapneumonic effusions in children. Pe-
diatrics 2002; 110:e37.
263. Picard E, Joseph L, Goldberg S, et al. Predictive factors of morbidity in
childhood parapneumonic effusion-associated pneumonia: a retro-
spective study. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2010; 29:840–3.
264. Burgess LJ, Maritz FJ, Le Roux I, et al. Combined use of pleural
adenosine deaminase with lymphocyte/neutrophil ratio. Increased
specificity for the diagnosis of tuberculous pleuritis. Chest 1996;
109:414–9.
265. Chiu CY, Wu JH, Wong KS. Clinical spectrum of tuberculous pleural
effusion in children. Pediatr Int 2007; 49:359–62.
266. Hawkins JA, Scaife ES, Hillman ND, et al. Current treatment of pe-
diatric empyema. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 16:196–200.
267. Sonnappa S, Cohen G, Owens CM, et al. Comparison of urokinase
and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for treatment of childhood
empyema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 174:221–7.
268. Grewal H, Jackson RJ, Wagner CW, et al. Early video-assisted thoracic
surgery in the management of empyema. Pediatrics 1999; 103:e63.
269. Kokoska ER, Chen MK. Position paper on video-assisted thoraco-
scopic surgery as treatment of pediatric empyema. J Pediatr Surg
2009; 44:289–93.
270. Shah SS, DiCristina CM, Bell LM, et al. Primary early thoracoscopy
and reduction in length of hospital stay and additional procedures
among children with complicated pneumonia: results of a multicenter
retrospective cohort study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2008; 162:
675–81.
271. Kurt BA, Winterhalter KM, Connors RH, et al. Therapy of para-
pneumonic effusions in children: video-assisted thoracoscopic sur-
gery versus conventional thoracostomy drainage. Pediatrics 2006;
118:e547–53.
272. Menendez R, Torres A. Treatment failure in community-acquired
pneumonia. Chest 2007; 132:1348–55.
273. Genne D, Kaiser L, Kinge TN, et al. Community-acquired pneumonia:
causes of treatment failure in patients enrolled in clinical trials. Clin
Microbiol Infect 2003; 9:949–54.
274. Casado Flores J, Nieto Moro M, Berron S, et al. Usefulness of pneu-
mococcal antigen detection in pleural effusion for the rapid diagnosis
of infection by Streptococcus pneumoniae . Eur J Pediatr 2010;
169:581–4.
275. Deresinski S. Vancomycin heteroresistance and methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Dis 2009; 199:605–9.
276. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Bacterial coinfections in
lung tissue specimens from fatal cases of 2009 pandemic influenza
A (H1N1)—United States, May–August 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal
Wkly Rep 2009; 58:1071–4.
277. Ampofo K, Bender J, Sheng X, et al. Seasonal invasive pneumococcal
disease in children: role of preceding respiratory viral infection. Pe-
diatrics 2008; 122:229–37.
278. Jansen AG, Sanders EA, van der Ende A, et al. Invasive pneumo-
coccal and meningococcal disease: association with influenza virus
and respiratory syncytial virus activity? Epidemiol Infect 2008;
136:1448–54.
279. Duttweiler L, Nadal D, Frey B. Pulmonary and systemic bacterial co-
infections in severe RSV bronchiolitis. Arch Dis Child 2004;
89:1155–7.
280. Randolph AG, Reder L, Englund JA. Risk of bacterial infection in
previously healthy respiratory syncytial virus-infected young children
admitted to the intensive care unit. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2004;2 3 : 9 9 0 – 4 .
281. Kneyber MC, Blusse van Oud-Alblas H, van Vliet M, et al. Concurrent
bacterial infection and prolonged mechanical ventilation in infants
with respiratory syncytial virus lower respiratory tract disease. In-
tensive Care Med 2005; 31:680–5.
282. Thorburn K, Harigopal S, Reddy V, et al. High incidence of pulmo-
nary bacterial co-infection in children with severe respiratory syncy-
tial virus (RSV) bronchiolitis. Thorax 2006; 61:611–5.
283. Chidi CC, Mendelsohn HJ. Lung abscess. A study of the results of
treatment based on 90 consecutive cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
1974; 68:168–72.
284. Estrera AS, Platt MR, Mills LJ, et al. Primary lung abscess. J Thorac
Cardiovasc Surg 1980; 79:275–82.
285. Ball WS Jr., Bisset GS 3rd, Towbin RB. Percutaneous drainage of chest
abscesses in children. Radiology 1989; 171:431–4.
286. Hoffer FA, Bloom DA, Colin AA, et al. Lung abscess versus necro-
tizing pneumonia: implications for interventional therapy. Pediatr
Radiol 1999; 29:87–91.
287. Lorenzo RL, Bradford BF, Black J, et al. Lung abscesses in children:
diagnostic and therapeutic needle aspiration. Radiology 1985;
157:79–80.
288. Patradoon-Ho P, Fitzgerald DA. Lung abscess in children. Paediatr
Respir Rev 2007; 8:77–84.
289. Halm EA, Fine MJ, Marrie TJ, et al. Time to clinical stability in pa-
tients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia: implica-
tions for practice guidelines. JAMA 1998; 279:1452–7.
290. Wexler ID, Knoll S, Picard E, et al. Clinical characteristics and out-
come of complicated pneumococcal pneumonia in a pediatric pop-
ulation. Pediatr Pulmonol 2006; 41:726–34.
291. Lynch T, Platt R, Gouin S, et al. Can we predict which children with
clinically suspected pneumonia will have the presence of focal in-
filtrates on chest radiographs? Pediatrics 2004; 113:e186–9.
292. American Academy of Pediatrics Subcommittee on Diagnosis and
Management of Bronchiolitis. Diagnosis and management of bron-
chiolitis. Pediatrics 2006; 118:1774–93.
293. Mennella JA, Beauchamp GK. Optimizing oral medications for chil-
dren. Clin Ther 2008; 30:2120–32.
294. Cohen R, de La Rocque F, Lecuyer A, et al. Study of the acceptability
of antibiotic syrups, suspensions, and oral solutions prescribed to
pediatric outpatients. Eur J Pediatr 2009; 168:851–7.
295. Ramgoolam A, Steele R. Formulations of antibiotics for children in
primary care: effects on compliance and efficacy. Paediatr Drugs 2002;
4:323–33.
296. Kobr J, Pizingerova K, Sasek L, et al. Treatment of encapsulated
pleural effusions in children: a prospective trial. Pediatr Int 2010;
52:453–8.
297. Bender BG, Bender SE. Patient-identified barriers to asthma treat-
ment adherence: responses to interviews, focus groups, and ques-
tionnaires. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2005; 25:107–30.
298. Snodgrass SR, Vedanarayanan VV, Parker CC, et al. Pediatric patients
with undetectable anticonvulsant blood levels: comparison with
compliant patients. J Child Neurol 2001; 16:164–8.
299. Bradley JS, Ching DK, Phillips SE. Outpatient therapy of serious pe-
diatric infections with ceftriaxone. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1988; 7:160–4.
300. Ruebner R, Keren R, Coffin S, et al. Complications of central venous
catheters used for the treatment of acute hematogenous osteomyelitis.
Pediatrics 2006; 117:1210–5.




301. Peltola H, Unkila-Kallio L, Kallio MJ. Simplified treatment of acute
staphylococcal osteomyelitis of childhood. The Finnish Study Group.
Pediatrics 1997; 99:846–50.
302. Zaoutis T, Localio AR, Leckerman K, et al. Prolonged intravenous
therapy versus early transition to oral antimicrobial therapy for acute
osteomyelitis in children. Pediatrics 2009; 123:636–42.
303. Watt JP, Wolfson LJ, O’Brien KL, et al. Burden of disease caused by
Haemophilus influenzae type b in children younger than 5 years: global
estimates. Lancet 2009; 374:903–11.
304. O’Brien KL, Wolfson LJ, Watt JP, et al. Burden of disease caused by
Streptococcus pneumoniae in children younger than 5 years: global
estimates. Lancet 2009; 374:893–902.
305. World pneumonia day: November 2, 2009. MMWR 2009; 58:1184.
306. Whitney CG, Farley MM, Hadler J, et al. Decline in invasive pneu-
mococcal disease after the introduction of protein-polysaccharide
conjugate vaccine. N Engl J Med 2003; 348:1737–46.
307. Adams WG, Deaver KA, Cochi SL, et al. Decline of childhood Hae-
mophilus influenzae type b (Hib) disease in the Hib vaccine era. JAMA
1993; 269:221–6.
308. Pilishvili T, Lexau C, Farley MM, et al. Sustained reductions in in-
vasive pneumococcal disease in the era of conjugate vaccine. J Infect
Dis 2010; 201:32–41.
309. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. ACIP provisional
recommendations for use of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vac-
cien (PCV13) among infants and children. Available at: http://
www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/wk/mm5909.pdf. Accessed 14 August 2011.
310. Bender JM, Ampofo K, Korgenski K, et al. Pneumococcal necrotizing
pneumonia in Utah: does serotype matter? Clin Infect Dis 2008;
46:1346–52.
311. Hortal M, Sehabiague G, Camou T, et al. Pneumococcal pneumonia
in hospitalized Uruguayan children and potential prevention with
different vaccine formulations. J Pediatr 2008; 152:850–3.
312. Tan TQ, Mason EO Jr., Wald ER, et al. Clinical characteristics of
children with complicated pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneu-
moniae. Pediatrics 2002; 110:1–6.
313. Langley JM, Kellner JD, Solomon N, et al. Empyema associated with
community-acquired pneumonia: a Pediatric Investigator’s Collabo-
rative Network on Infections in Canada (PICNIC) study. BMC Infect
Dis 2008; 8:129.
314. Ramphul N, Eastham KM, Freeman R, et al. Cavitatory lung disease
complicating empyema in children. Pediatr Pulmonol 2006;4 1 :
750–3.
315. Eastham KM, Freeman R, Kearns AM, et al. Clinical features, aetiol-
ogy and outcome of empyema in children in the north east of Eng-
land. Thorax 2004; 59:522–5.
316. Eltringham G, Kearns A, Freeman R, et al. Culture-negative childhood
empyema is usually due to penicillin-sensitive Streptococcus pneu-
moniae capsular serotype 1. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41:521–2.
317. Neuzil KM, Mellen BG, Wright PF, et al. The effect of influenza on
hospitalizations, outpatient visits, and courses of antibiotics in chil-
dren. N Engl J Med 2000; 342:225–31.
318. Ampofo K, Gesteland PH, Bender J, et al. Epidemiology, complica-
tions, and cost of hospitalization in children with laboratory-
confirmed influenza infection. Pediatrics 2006; 118:2409–17.
319. Izurieta HS, Thompson WW, Kramarz P, et al. Influenza and the rates
of hospitalization for respiratory disease among infants and young
children. N Engl J Med 2000; 342:232–9.
320. Poehling KA, Edwards KM, Weinberg GA, et al. The underrecog-
nized burden of influenza in young children. N Engl J Med 2006;
355:31–40.
321. Joshi AY, Iyer VN, St Sauver JL, et al. Effectiveness of inactivated
influenza vaccine in children less than 5 years of age over multiple
influenza seasons: a case-control study. Vaccine 2009; 27:4457–61.
322. Belshe RB, Edwards KM, Vesikari T, et al. Live attenuated versus
inactivated influenza vaccine in infants and young children. N Engl
J Med 2007; 356:685–96.
323. O’Brien KL, Walters MI, Sellman J, et al. Severe pneumococcal
pneumonia in previously healthy children: the role of preceding in-
fluenza infection. Clin Infect Dis 2000; 30:784–9.
324. Finelli L, Fiore A, Dhara R, et al. Influenza-associated pediatric
mortality in the United States: increase of Staphylococcus aureus
coinfection. Pediatrics. 2008 Oct; 122(4):805–11.
325. Chien YW, Klugman KP, Morens DM. Bacterial pathogens and
death during the 1918 influenza pandemic. N Engl J Med 2009;
361:2582–3.
326. Klugman KP, Chien YW, Madhi SA. Pneumococcal pneumonia and
influenza: a deadly combination. Vaccine 2009; 27(Suppl 3):C9–C14.
327. Klugman KP, Astley CM, Lipsitch M. Time from illness onset to
death, 1918 influenza and pneumococcal pneumonia. Emerg Infect
Dis 2009; 15:346–7.
328. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. ACIP provisional recom-
mendations for the use of influenza vaccines. 2010. Available at: http://
www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr59e0729.pdf. Accessed 14 August 2011.
329. Hall CB, Weinberg GA, Iwane MK, et al. The burden of respiratory
syncytial virus infection in young children. N Engl J Med 2009;
360:588–98.
330. Meissner HC, Bocchini JA Jr, Brady MT, et al. The role of im-
munoprophylaxis in the reduction of disease attributable to re-
spiratory syncytial virus. Pediatrics 2009; 124:1676–9.
331. Dowell SF, Kupronis BA, Zell ER, et al. Mortality from pneumonia in
children in the United States, 1939 through 1996. N Engl J Med 2000;
342:1399–407.
332. Weiss AK, Hall M, Lee GE, et al. Adjunct corticosteroids in children
hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. Pediatrics 2011;
127:e255–63.
333. Gorton CP, Jones JL. Wide geographic variation between Pennsyl-
vania counties in the population rates of hospital admissions for
pneumonia among children with and without comorbid chronic
conditions. Pediatrics 2006; 117:176–80.
334. Lieu TA, Ray GT, Black SB, et al. Projected cost-effectiveness of
pneumococcal conjugate vaccination of healthy infants and young
children. JAMA 2000; 283:1460–8.
335. Paladino JA, Adelman MH, Schentag JJ, et al. Direct costs in patients
hospitalised with community-acquired pneumonia after non-
response to outpatient treatment with macrolide antibacterials in the
US. Pharmacoeconomics 2007; 25:677–83.
336. Shoham Y, Dagan R, Givon-Lavi N, et al. Community-acquired
pneumonia in children: quantifying the burden on patients and their
families including decrease in quality of life. Pediatrics 2005;
115:1213–9.
337. Kohn GL, Walston C, Feldstein J, et al. Persistent abnormal lung
function after childhood empyema. Am J Respir Med 2002; 1:441–5.
338. McLaughlin FJ, Goldmann DA, Rosenbaum DM, et al. Empyema in
children: clinical course and long-term follow-up. Pediatrics 1984;
73:587–93.
339. Redding GJ, Walund L, Walund D, et al. Lung function in children
following empyema. Am J Dis Child 1990; 144:1337–42.
340. Satish B, Bunker M, Seddon P. Management of thoracic empyema in
childhood: does the pleural thickening matter? Arch Dis Child 2003;
88:918–21.